Post by account_disabled on Nov 29, 2023 13:37:44 GMT 10
breakdown of the issue, but once you have broken your pages down into “unique questions” (or more like “unique answers to unique questions”), you then are faced with which of these pages are more important from a search perspective and which are not. Coming up with a formula to dynamically prioritize these pages across millions of records and thousands, if not millions, of keyword combinations is where it gets tricky. Daniel, thanks for pointing us towards the Endeca sitemap product page. This morning I heard from Steve Papa, Endeca’s CEO, who also mentioned this. St
eve claims: “it is impossible to calculate the number of valid paths Asia Mobile Number List
through a set of facets. The only way to do it is to empirically crawl the data…We used an 80-90,000 record data set with an average of 12 facets per record. If you did the simple factorial calculation you would get 10^34 possible paths. But as it turns out most of those paths don’t exist (for example in a car data set there are no BMW pickup trucks or Hummer hybrids but the facets suggest one might be possible). The actual number of paths was on the order of 250,000,000 — still a 3,000x increase from the numb
er of records! But a small fraction of the “theoretically possible” paths.” I have not looked into how Endeca’s sitemap product solves the SEO problem, it is a tool that allows you to create linear paths to results pages. If that is the case then you still have to decide which of the 250,000,000 results you are going to prioritize for search and that’s where the SEO headache begins. I’d love to hear from Endeca if that is not the case. Andrew Shotland October 20, 2008 at 9:03 pm One other point on this re Steve’s Hummer.
eve claims: “it is impossible to calculate the number of valid paths Asia Mobile Number List
through a set of facets. The only way to do it is to empirically crawl the data…We used an 80-90,000 record data set with an average of 12 facets per record. If you did the simple factorial calculation you would get 10^34 possible paths. But as it turns out most of those paths don’t exist (for example in a car data set there are no BMW pickup trucks or Hummer hybrids but the facets suggest one might be possible). The actual number of paths was on the order of 250,000,000 — still a 3,000x increase from the numb
er of records! But a small fraction of the “theoretically possible” paths.” I have not looked into how Endeca’s sitemap product solves the SEO problem, it is a tool that allows you to create linear paths to results pages. If that is the case then you still have to decide which of the 250,000,000 results you are going to prioritize for search and that’s where the SEO headache begins. I’d love to hear from Endeca if that is not the case. Andrew Shotland October 20, 2008 at 9:03 pm One other point on this re Steve’s Hummer.